Asus AGP-V3500 Driver
Free drivers for ASUS AGP-V Series. Found 1 file for Windows , Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows 95, Windows NT, Windows 98 SE. Select driver. Download the latest ASUS NVIDIA AGP-V device drivers (Official and Certified). ASUS NVIDIA AGP-V drivers updated daily. Download Now. ASUS AGP-V /T (AGP 4x, 32 MB) overview and full product specs on g: V
|Supported systems:||Windows Vista (32/64-bit), Windows XP (32/64-bit), Windows 8, Windows 10|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Registration Required]|
Asus AGP-V3500 Driver
ASUS AGP-V /T (AGP 4x, 32 MB) Specs - CNET
Asus AGP-V3500 Normally we do not care for synthetic benchmarks but this one Asus AGP-V3500 based on a real application that should be out in the near future. There are many tests available in 3DMark so I chose a few to start out with and at the resolution of x Originally I had the data for all the resolutions we normally do but it was overkill and we do not want to miss the point of the tests by flooding you with too much information.
Please note that the 3dfx VD3 would not run any of the 3DMark tests for whatever reasons. I am working to get things going for it next review. Asus AGP-V3500
ASUS AGP-V 7100/T (AGP 4x, 32 MB) Specs
It could be drivers or it could be the benchmark for all we know. The Winfast GeForce card is slightly ahead of the other two 'stock' GeForce cards but by less than Asus AGP-V3500 reasonable margin of error that comes into play in these tests. Benchmark Results - 3DMark - Fill-Rate single texture We hear all these theoretical numbers about fill-rate but this is what happens when we actually put cards to the real test.
It is interesting to see that most of the cards are nearly identical in performance and Asus AGP-V3500 can assure you that this is the case even at x resolution in this test. The only thing that confuses my ideas about the benchmark having problems is the fact that the Asus AGP-V3500 V smokes the stock V This will have to be investigated further. Keep in mind that this test is single-texture fill-rate. Switching our little fill-rate test to bit color returned Asus AGP-V3500 rather interesting results.
No surprises Asus AGP-V3500 the GeForce cards as they all line up at about the same performance. Benchmark Results - 3DMark - Fill-Rate quad texture So we hear all about multi-texturing in this case quad or four textures per pixel from everyone but what happens when we actually use it? As you can see from the above results, the GeForce cards have no problem dealing with it while the competition chugs Asus AGP-V3500.
The GeForce cards are all neck and neck while the overclocked V takes a reasonable lead.
As we throw in bit textures the set of GeForce cards stay together but fall much farther behind the higher clocked V and nearly letting the TNT2 Ultra catch them. It is a bit shocking to see the TNT2 Ultra get Asus AGP-V3500 close. This test has an amazingtriangles on the screen with 4 Asus AGP-V3500 1 directional and 3 point lights.
ASUS AGP V3500 Series Cards 101
Every card but the TNT2 Asus AGP-V3500 took an even performance hit from the color depth increase. Note that even the overclocked card is barely ahead. Although we have tapped the resolution up a bit, the story stays the same.
Notice how the competitors seemed Asus AGP-V3500 drop greatly in performance at this point. Now that the resolution has been pumped up, the cards begin to drop-off in performance. Although very slight, the V card seems to have an edge over its competition. We can also see that the overclocked board is sitting pretty at the top with its Asus AGP-V3500 lead. The only way you will see a difference in performance between the competing GeForce cards will be if the driver revision is that different from the others which is not the case here.
ASUS AGP-V drivers
At the xx16 resolution, the CPU problem starts to taper off as you can see by the overclocked card pulling ahead but it does not change the fact that the GeForce cards are basically even. Benchmark Results - Descent 3 OpenGL Once again we have the low-resolution situation where most of the Asus AGP-V3500 are in Asus AGP-V3500 same performance area and the GeForce boards themselves are basically all tied.
The competing boards are still very much even at this point. Here we have a little surprise as the Asus AGP-V3500 board pushes slightly ahead of its competition. The overclocked Asus V charges ahead as it keeps a strong lead.
Benchmark Results Asus AGP-V3500 Quake 3 Arena x With the Asus AGP-V3500 of Quake 3 Arena everyone has been anxious to see the final performance of each chipset. At the lower resolutions we will not see a big difference between the GeForce cards still but we can compare how they do against the competition. It looks like everyone can do the low-resolution normal settings just Asus AGP-V3500. With demo we see the similar results as we did in demo Throwing the cards into bit mode and greater complexity even at low resolution seems to actually slow things down a tad as we see the overclocked card gain some ground Asus AGP-V3500 it normally does not.
However, the rest of the GeForce line-up is all tied up. Demo Asus AGP-V3500 not seem to be as critical on the higher quality settings as demo was since the overclocked Asus AGP-V3500 is barely getting any benefit. The G MAX seems to be pulling its weight in this test as well. Benchmark Results - Quake 3 Arena Asus AGP-V3500 Shifting the video into the middle resolution we see the GeForce competition back off. The big boys are all still in an even line while the overclocked monster keeps a quicker pace.